RESET: Review of Education, Science, and Technology implements a Double-Blind Peer Review system as a commitment to ensuring fairness, objectivity, and the highest standards of scholarly publishing. In this process, the identities of both authors and reviewers remain confidential throughout the review to minimize bias and guarantee an independent, impartial evaluation. The review system is based on the following principles:

• Confidentiality: The identities of authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout the review process.
• Objective Evaluation: Manuscripts are assessed solely on their originality, scientific quality, methodological rigor, and contribution to education, science, and technology.
• Independent Review: Reviewers evaluate manuscripts without knowledge of the authors' identities or institutional affiliations.
• Publication Ethics: The review process adheres to internationally accepted publication ethics, maintaining confidentiality, research integrity, and freedom from conflicts of interest.
• Editorial Transparency: Authors receive editorial decisions together with anonymous reviewer comments to support manuscript improvement.

Peer Review Workflow

• 1. Technical Screening
  The editorial office verifies manuscript compliance with the journal's author guidelines, ethical standards, and aims & scope.
• 2. Initial Editorial Assessment
  The Editor evaluates the manuscript's relevance, originality, academic merit, and overall suitability for peer review.
• 3. Handling Editor Assignment
  A Handling Editor is assigned to supervise and manage the entire double-blind peer review process.
• 4. Reviewer Selection
  Qualified reviewers with expertise relevant to the manuscript's subject area are invited to evaluate the submission.
• 5. Double-Blind Peer Review
  Reviewers provide confidential evaluations, constructive comments, and publication recommendations while remaining anonymous.
• 6. Author Revision
  Authors revise the manuscript in response to reviewer comments and editorial recommendations.
• 7. Final Editorial Decision
  The Editor makes the final decision based on reviewer recommendations and the revised manuscript. Possible outcomes include:
  • Accept
  • Minor Revision
  • Major Revision
  • Resubmit for Review
  • Reject
• 8. Publication
  Accepted manuscripts proceed through copyediting, proofreading, typesetting, and final publication as Open Access articles.