Active Learning: A Strategy to Improve the Quality of Mathematics Learning

Authors

  • Miyejav de Ramos Mongolian University of Science and Technology image/svg+xml Author
  • Clarissa Anella Gravi Mongolian University of Science and Technology image/svg+xml Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66031/smarth.v2i2.715

Keywords:

Active Learning, Mathematics Learning, Student Engagement, Learning Quality

Abstract

Active learning is often associated with increased student participation, yet its contribution to mathematics learning quality depends on whether participation generates substantive mathematical thinking. This conceptual review develops an integrative framework explaining how active learning can support higher-quality mathematics learning. Relevant literature on active learning, mathematical activities, student engagement, teacher facilitation, and mathematics learning quality was synthesized to identify their conceptual relationships. The synthesis conceptualizes active learning as a pedagogical orientation enacted through purposeful mathematical activities involving problem solving, representation, reasoning, communication, and reflection. Student engagement functions as the core mechanism through which these activities become meaningful learning experiences, while teacher facilitation operates as a cross-cutting condition that designs, supports, monitors, and adapts learning processes. Mathematics learning quality is conceptualized as an emergent consequence reflected in deeper understanding, mathematical reasoning, problem solving, communication, representation, and meaningful application of knowledge. The resulting framework integrates five interrelated components and five conceptual propositions. Rather than proposing a fixed causal sequence, it represents a dynamic pedagogical system in which purposeful activity, sustained engagement, and responsive facilitation interact to create conditions for meaningful mathematical learning. The framework offers a conceptual basis for designing active mathematics learning and guiding future empirical investigation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bezanilla, M. J., Fernández-Nogueira, D., Poblete, M., & Galindo-Domínguez, H. (2019). Methodologies for teaching-learning critical thinking in higher education: The teacher’s view. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 100584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100584

Bossi, K. M. L., & Schimiguel, J. (2020). Active methodologies in the teaching of mathematics: State of the art. Research, Society and Development, 9(4), e47942819. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i4.2819

Braun, B., Bremser, P., Duval, A., Lockwood, E., & White, D. (2017). What does active learning mean for mathematicians? Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 64(2), 124–129. https://doi.org/10.1090/noti1472

Cahyono, A. N., & Ludwig, M. (2019). Teaching and learning mathematics around the city supported by the use of digital technology. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(1), Article em1658. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/99514

Cano de la Cruz, Y., Aguiar Monar, J. C., & Mendoza Roman, M. C. (2019). The need for active methodologies at the Reino de Inglaterra School. Educación, 43(2), 484–492. https://doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v43i2.29094

Candela-Munoz, J. L., & Rodríguez-Gámez, M. (2023). Active methodologies in mathematics learning. International Journal of Physics & Mathematics, 6(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijpm.v6n1.2226

Dahlan, T., Judijanto, L., & Hali, F. (2024). Improving the quality of mathematics teacher education: An integrated approach to the 4C skills. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 9(1), 16–31. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v9i1.2687

Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A. (2013). Creative learning environments in education: A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.07.004

Edwards, S. (2015). Active learning in the middle grades classroom: Overcoming the barriers to implementation. Middle Grades Research Journal, 10(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1108/MGRJ-05-2015-0007

Friz, M., Panes, R., Salcedo, P., & Sanhueza, S. (2018). El proceso de enseñanza y aprendizaje de las matemáticas: Concepciones de los futuros profesores del sur de Chile. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 20(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.24320/redie.2018.20.1.1455

Ludwig, M., & Jablonski, S. (2021). Step by step: Simplifying and mathematizing the real world with MathCityMap. Quadrante, 30, 242–268. https://doi.org/10.48489/quadrante.23604

Nithyanandam, G. K. (2020). A framework to improve the quality of teaching-learning process—A case study. Procedia Computer Science, 172, 92–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.013

Padrón Alvarez, A., & Rosas Meneses, V. A. (2024). From theory to practice with artificial intelligence: Experience of project-based learning in higher education. In C. Hervás-Gómez, M. D. Díaz-Noguera, & F. Sánchez-Vera (Eds.), The education revolution through artificial intelligence (pp. 71–86). Octaedro. https://doi.org/10.36006/09651-1-05

Saidi, S., Suryowati, E., Sholihah, U., & Fatqurhohman, F. (2025). Literature Review on the Role of School Principals in the Society 5.0: Strategies and Future Challenges. RESET: Review of Education, Science, and Technology, 1(1), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.66031/reset.v1i1.20

Udjaja, Y., Guizot, V. S., & Chandra, N. (2018). Gamification for elementary mathematics learning in Indonesia. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 8(5), 3860–3865. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v8i5.pp3860-3865

Vale, I., & Barbosa, A. (2020). Gallery Walk: Uma estratégia ativa para resolver problemas com múltiplas soluções [Gallery Walk: An active strategy to solve problems with multiple solutions]. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Educação Matemática, 17, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.37001/remat25269062v17id260

Vale, I., & Barbosa, A. (2021). Promoting mathematical knowledge and skills in a mathematical classroom using a Gallery Walk. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 7, 1211–1225. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.2417

Vale, I., & Barbosa, A. (2023). Active learning strategies for an effective mathematics teaching and learning. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(3), 573–588. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/13135

Vale, I., Barbosa, A., & Cabrita, I. (2019). Mathematics outside the classroom: Examples with pre-service teachers. Quaderni di Ricerca in Didattica (Mathematics), 2, 137–142.

Vale, I., Barbosa, A., & Cabrita, I. (2020). Paper folding for an active learning of mathematics: An experience with preservice teachers. Quaderni di Ricerca in Didattica (Mathematics), 7, 53–59.

Villalobos-López, J. A. (2022). Active learning methodologies and educational ethics. Revista Docentes 2.0, 13(2), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v13i2.316

Downloads

Published

15-10-2026

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. Additional datasets are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ramos, M. de, & Gravi, C. A. (2026). Active Learning: A Strategy to Improve the Quality of Mathematics Learning. SMARTH: Journal of Mathematics Education and Learning, 2(2), 117-130. https://doi.org/10.66031/smarth.v2i2.715